n8n

n8n AI

n8n AI

n8n AI

n8n AI

n8n AI

n8n AI

n8n AI

n8n AI

n8n AI

n8n AI

Has anyone connected Claude to Instagram for reel analysis and content strategy?

I run marketing for a real estate company and have Claude Pro. I've already shared Instagram Insights and Meta Business Suite data with Claude, but I'm looking for something deeper. What I want is for Claude to effectively act as a content strategist by analyzing: -Reels and videos -Audience retention drops -Hook effectiveness -Content themes -Engagement patterns -Lead-generation potential For example, if a reel loses 40% of viewers in the first 3 seconds, I'd like Claude to help identify whether the issue is the hook, pacing, visuals, messaging, or something else. I've seen many creators say things like "I gave Claude access to my Instagram and it helped me grow from 20 followers to 20k," but I'm not sure what their actual setup looks like. From what I've read, Claude doesn't currently have a native/direct Instagram integration, so I'm curious how people are doing this in practice. Are you using: -Meta APIs? -MCP servers? -Zapier, Make, n8n, or another connector? -A custom solution? -Manual exports from Meta Business Suite? Ideally, I'd love a setup where Claude can regularly access my Instagram content and performance data and provide ongoing recommendations. A few specific questions: What is the best way to connect Instagram data to Claude? Are there any free or low-cost third-party connectors you'd recommend? What data can Claude realistically access and analyze? How safe is it to give a third-party connector access to an Instagram business account? Are there any security or privacy concerns I should be aware of? My goal isn't just more views—it's generating qualified real estate leads from Instagram. Would love to hear how others have set this up. submitted by /u/FishermanMaster2821 [link] [comments]

Hiring Senior Founding Engineer - Bay Area funded startup

I'm hiring a Senior Founding backend engineer for my venture-backend startup at the pre-seed/seed stage. Location: hybrid in SF Bay Area Work authorization: permanently authorized (US citizen, green card holders etc.) Requirements: 5+ years of professional experience in backend development 1+ years in building LLM powered apps (RAG, Agentic workflows etc). Note: n8n or low/no-code apps don't count. Application: DM your LinkedIn + Resume (link if Reddit doesn't let you upload a file). Interview process: no Leetcode - behavioral rounds - 1 take-home system design Onsite: -technical discussion - live code debugging -lunch + meet-the-team. Compensation: competitive, founding hire level equity. Notes: No Agencies / Contracting firms. We conduct background checks + bring you onsite IN-PERSON for interviews. submitted by /u/huh_whar [link] [comments]

Replacing 6-figure HubSpot agency quoted with Claude Code - here's how.

Quick note up front: this post was drafted with Claude. I've been a lurker in this sub for a long time and wanted to actually contribute something back, in case it helps someone thinking about a similar build. The experience, the decisions, the numbers are mine — Claude just helped me structure the write-up. We're a mid-sized e-commerce company. ~15 product spread across direct sales (Shopify), subscriptions (Recharge), affiliate/digital (Digistore24 + GoAffPro), plus a small ads stack (Meta + Google). Needed to migrate to HubSpot Enterprise — Zoho CRM, Zoho Desk, and KlickTipp all retiring at once. We talked to four HubSpot Solutions Partners. Quotes: 20k EUR (templated setup, basically a wizard), 35k, 55k, 80k EUR (mid-tier custom objects + 2-3 integrations). None of them would handle our actual stack end-to-end — custom middleware for sync/reconciliation isn't standard partner repertoire. We'd own that part with our own dev resources either way. I decided to build it with Claude Code — the desktop app, not the API. Mostly Opus 4.7. Subscription plan, no usage-based billing. Four months in. Here's what actually works. What got built (numbers, not narrative) 6 Custom Objects + ~100 properties + associations 5 source-system integrations on self-hosted n8n: Shopify, Digistore24, Recharge, GoAffPro, Cart-Notifier — each with inbox pattern, idempotent upserts, reconciliation, backoff/retry, audit trail 1 custom Cloud Run service for inbox-polling at 15s cadence 10 Lifecycle stages + Funnel/Segment property layer Aggregator workflow that backfills 9 contact properties from sync-mirror objects (idempotent, Postgres cursor, cron-driven) KlickTipp migration: 202 tags audited, custom object for webinar registrations, consent governance Google Ads CAPI (11 conversion actions, enhanced conversions) + Meta CAPI (Pixel + server-side, layer 2 in progress) 33 ADRs (architecture decisions, append-only, never deleted) ~30 implementation sessions with Claude Code, ~2-4h each If anyone delivered all of this end-to-end as an agency: realistically 120-180k EUR Netto. Most can't, because the custom middleware part isn't in their wheelhouse. The biggest mental shift: Claude Code isn't (just) a coding assistant This is the part most people miss. "Claude Code" sounds like an IDE tool for writing code. In our setup, maybe 20% of what's in the repo is actual code. The other 80% is Markdown — architecture decisions, integration specs, runbooks, cheatsheets, ADRs. The repo is the system-of-record for how the business runs in HubSpot. Custom objects, properties, workflows, lifecycle stages, consent governance, naming conventions — all documented as Markdown alongside the few scripts we actually need. When code IS needed, Claude writes it. A Python helper to regenerate an index file, a backfill script for historical orders, a Cloud Run service for inbox-polling — Claude writes those on demand and they live in the repo. When workflow logic is needed, we delegate to n8n. We don't try to make Claude write hand-tuned automation code; we describe the workflow and Claude builds or updates the n8n workflow via the n8n MCP server. Low-code where it makes sense, real code where it doesn't, Markdown for everything else. The result: a single repo that is simultaneously documentation, configuration, and code. Any new session — mine or future contributors' — can read it and understand the entire business architecture in HubSpot, not just the codebase. The other big lesson: the repo IS the memory between sessions Claude Code sessions are stateless. Every conversation starts fresh. If you treat that as a problem, you'll hate the workflow. If you treat it as a design constraint, you build a system where state lives in files, not chat history. Concretely: ADRs capture every architecture decision with reasoning and trade-offs. New sessions read them and don't re-debate. Spec files per integration/area, each with a Status header. Single source of truth for "is this implemented, what's the current state." Slash commands (/implement, /verify, /new-task) encode the workflow. They're not just shortcuts — they enforce discipline. Definition-of-Done gate before commit, drift checks against live state, atomic status updates. Tool-class cheatsheet: which HubSpot operations work via standard API tools, which need direct API calls, which need UI clicks. Eliminates trial-and-error per session. Known-bugs cheatsheet: every quirk we hit (HubSpot search index latency, Recharge enumeration-vs-bool, n8n auth races) gets curated. Next session starts knowing what's known. Context7 MCP for current API docs. Claude's training data isn't current, and HubSpot/n8n APIs change. Before any external call, Claude does a Context7 lookup against the actual current docs. Skipping this used to cost us hours of trial-and-error against deprecated endpoints. Now it's a required step in /implement. Claude reads the relevant files at the start of each s

What does your client actually have access to once an AI workflow is live?

Once an automation is live, what does the client actually have access to? I've heard people handle this completely differently. Some just give clients direct access to n8n or Make and move on. Fast to set up but clients end up confused or poking around where they shouldn't. Some apparently build out a separate thing for the client to log into. A simpler view of what's running, what was delivered. The thinking being that if a client feels like they're using something proper they're less likely to churn. Not sure how many people actually do this or if it's worth the time. Most freelancers in this space want recurring monthly work, not one-off builds. So retention matters. But I genuinely don't know if a cleaner client experience moves the needle on that or if clients just stay when the automations keep working. When something breaks, does the client even know before you do? Or do they just message you when they noticed it stopped working two days ago? Wondering if building something client-facing is actually worth the extra hours or if most people just skip it. submitted by /u/Still_Dependent_3936 [link] [comments]

Which provider fits best for my needs?

Hi everyone, I’m looking to get more into experimenting with AI and considering a paid subscription, but I’m a bit unsure which direction makes the most sense for my use case. My main goals: -Writing a technical book in the field of taxation -Preparing presentations and structured content -Learning and experimenting with programming -Building automation workflows (e.g. n8n) -Running or experimenting with tools like Hermes / OpenClaw (I know Claude doesn’t work everywhere there) -Testing new AI features (e.g. Claude artifacts, coding tools, agents, etc.) From what I’ve read recently, opinions are all over the place: Some say ChatGPT (with Codex-style tools) is strongest for coding + general use Others argue Claude is better for writing and reasoning-heavy tasks Gemini seems strong for long context and Google integration And then there’s the API route (DeepSeek looks extremely cheap right now and seems attractive for experimentation) So I’m trying to figure out what actually makes sense in practice. Would you recommend: A ChatGPT subscription Claude Pro Gemini Advanced Or skipping subscriptions and going API-first with models like DeepSeek / others? Would really appreciate real-world experiences—especially from people doing a mix of writing + coding + automation rather than just one narrow use case. Thanks! (Ai generated as englisch is not my mother language) submitted by /u/ilgin3113 [link] [comments]

Help getting a workflow to work properly

Coming out of a long day of back-to-back meetings, I had an idea to use Claude to help me keep track of things. The general idea is that I could write a skill that I would invoke "/evening-ritual" and Claude would peruse through my Gmail and Calendar, looking at all of the meetings I sat in and the emails that I sent/received. We use Gemini Notes/Transcripts for *most* of our meetings at work, so it would match those up. Then, I could hit "Voice Mode" and have it talk through my day with me, going meeting by meeting. For the ones where it has a transcript, we would talk through any action items or things I need/want to remember. For meetings without a transcript, it would ask me for things I remembered or might've written down physically, etc. It would then produce an overview of my day - key decision points, any open loops, things I need to come back to, action items, etc, and drop it into a markdown file that would get created/pushed to my Obsidian Vault. The idea is that then, I could have a similar morning routine that would recap things that are pressing from the previous day, or upcoming important meetings I should prep for (anything with less than 4 people OR a meeting with an attendee outside our company). This seems easy enough, but doing it via Claude Chat was an exercise in frustration: It had A LOT of trouble finding transcripts; notably, ones that I had already marked as "read" in my inbox. It also seemed to not understand that "Gemini Meeting Notes" included notes *and* a transcript It skipped meetings, and I had to remind it to go chronologically through the day Even when I gave it the transcript directly, it seemed to struggle to find action items for me, and twice it asked me to summarize the meeting instead of it reading the transcript I had just provided, "to ensure it didn't misread anything". It was also frustrating trying to use voice mode but then also sometimes trying to give it a link to a document and then enter back into voice mode. Anyone got any ideas to better solve for this? I know I could build something like this in n8n, but I really didn't want to spin all that up when this seemed like such an easy Claude task. Should I try it in Cowork instead of Claude Chat? submitted by /u/DruVatier [link] [comments]

I built an AI-native Business OS using Claude, Obsidian, and n8n

I built an AI-native Business OS using Claude + Obsidian + n8n and it’s changed the way I operate completely. The interesting part isn’t really the AI itself. It’s the architecture around it. Claude became dramatically more useful once I stopped treating it like a chatbot and started treating it like an intelligence layer connected to structured context. Current setup: - Obsidian stores operational memory - Claude handles contextual reasoning/writing - n8n orchestrates workflows + triggers Some things the system now does automatically: - generates morning briefings before I wake up, - prepares pre-call client summaries, - surfaces open issues/followups, - drafts content from rough notes, - and keeps operational context persistent across projects. One thing I’ve learned building this: AI becomes exponentially more useful when paired with: - structured memory, - clean workflows, - and consistent operational context. Otherwise every conversation starts from zero again. I also try to keep the system grounded pretty heavily: - outputs are treated as drafts/briefings, - important decisions always get human review, - and most workflows are retrieval/context based rather than open-ended generation. The goal isn’t replacing thinking. The goal is reducing operational clutter so more deliberate thinking can happen. Curious if anyone else here is building similar “AI operating system” style workflows around Claude. submitted by /u/liberal_bhakt [link] [comments]

[Virtual] AI Saturdays - Workflow Automation with AI (23rd May, 6 PM ET)

Hosting this Saturday's AI Saturdays session on workflow automation with AI. The idea: most jobs have recurring tasks that look the same every week. Read the email, pull out the key info, log it somewhere, send a follow-up. Tools like n8n and Make let you chain AI into those flows so the work runs on its own. We'll look at how the pieces fit together with AI. Link: https://www.meetup.com/chillnskill/events/314617067/ submitted by /u/Competitive_Risk_977 [link] [comments]

Best way to use Claude daily — Web app vs Claude Code (VS Code) vs API? What's your setup?

I've been using Claude through the web app but I'm wondering if I'm leaving value on the table. I've heard people talk about: Claude.ai (web app) — the default Claude Code — the CLI/VS Code integration Direct API — full control, build your own setup What's the real difference in your day-to-day use? Is Claude Code worth switching to if you're not a developer? What can you do with one that you can't do with the others? Currently using Claude mainly for workflow automation (n8n), writing, and research. submitted by /u/Gullible_Wrangler_53 [link] [comments]

Need to connect Docsend to Claude

Been able to automate a good chunk of my work with claude, N8N etc but there have been a couple that I have just not been able to crack. So my background isnt technical so been able to do these things so far by watching videos or simply asking an ai tool. Currently, I am stuck on trying to integrate docsend into claude so it runs a simple flow: I was thinking sending / uploading a pdf into a form, it uploads it to docsend and sends me by slack, mail etc a viewable link so I can share. Would appreciate any feedback on how as I am stuck (couldnt get docsend's API and MCP) Thank you in advance submitted by /u/Electrical_Editor880 [link] [comments]

Help passing data between two Claudes

I'm having trouble and Claude wasn't much help. I use Claude Desktop, and have a work Claude account (provided by/paid for by work) and a personal Claude account. They must remain separate, and they are installed on different machines. HOWEVER, I would like for Personal Claude to have *some* level of insight into what Work Claude is helping me with. Not all the details, just the high level, so it has context. If you've seen Severance, I'm trying to build a bridge between my Innie and my Outie. I was able to write a skill for my Work Claude, that I can initiate in any session, to have it store pertinent details. Then, I wanted to set up a scheduled task for both Work and Personal. Work to write a brief and store it ... somewhere ... and then Personal to read that brief and ingest. My first thought was a Google Doc. Clean and easy, except that the Google Drive/Docs MCP apparently doesn't support write functionality. I explored using webhooks and n8n, but that was a cluster as well. Finally settled on Notion, and it works, but it's messy because I don't use Notion for literally anything else, and based on my light research, I don't really have any other need for it outside of this. I'm also trying to get setup with Obsidian and figure out how to use that to keep myself more organized. That would actually be a perfect use-case for this document to pass things from Work to Personal, except for the whole local-storage thing. Any other suggestions? I dislike having a single-use tool like Notion in the middle. The key limitation is that this is a fully automated effort, using Scheduled Actions in Claude Cowork. EDIT: I appreciate the concern and watch-outs. These are things that I had already considered, which is why I built a specific skill to generate these, and included a HITL review point, as well. The skill helps to specify that I am *not* looking for details or any protected business information. I'm specifically looking for notes, comments, and insights about how I work, how I make decisions (or avoid them), and other observations about who I am at work, which is somewhat different than how I manage things in my personal life. The output and information that I'm sharing is something I would be absolutely comfortable sharing with my boss or our CEO/CTO. submitted by /u/DruVatier [link] [comments]

Gsc, ga4, gads + claude code

​ Witam wszystkich, szukam pomysłów i workflow jak to wszystko spiąć. Zastanawiam się nad n8n do generowania raportów co tydzień/miesiąc i podpięcie claude za pomocą MCP do bierzecych pytań. Dodatkowo chce spiąć claude z WP i Woo do wprowadzania zmian na produktach itp. czy ktoś z was robił coś takiego i może podzielić się doświadczeniem, jakie problemy napotkał itp? Bazę wiedzy mam w obsydian i chciałbym tam mieć analizy a raporty w jakimś csv np na Google driver. Jeżeli źle myślę proszę o porady. Z góry dzięki submitted by /u/Icy_Froyo_8027 [link] [comments]

N8N

Anyone actively using this? Trying to learn it for work doing some classes on it got a pretty good handle but I don’t need to bug my IT guy every other day about nuances. Advice? Also this shit super fun. submitted by /u/K_Tronica [link] [comments]

Leveraging Claude Pro to N8N automation

Hello Good day everyone! I would like to ask some tips of how to leverage on subscribed Claude Pro to help learn N8n Workflow Automation. I wanna learn the in depth of it like how to handled errors and stuff, I know that Claude Code can automatically create Workflow from me but I want my knowledge to be in depth so I can Monetize it. submitted by /u/Relative_Capital_610 [link] [comments]

Claude code on E-commerce Brand

Recently, I built a swarm of AI agents to replace our customer service representatives and I hosted it on n8n. I also built an automation to give us a daily report. All these was built from Claude, I wonder what else can I build to help push our company forward? Any tips or recommendations? submitted by /u/Direct-Football7180 [link] [comments]